El fenotipo "basal-her2" en el cáncer de mama: caracterización clínico-molecular e implicaciones terapéuticas

Clinically HER2+ (cHER2+) breast cancer (BC), as exclusively determined by immunohistochemistry of HER2 protein overexpression and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization of HER2 gene amplification, has been largely considered a single disease entity in terms of clinical outcome and in the susceptibility to the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin). However, although the adjuvant/neoadjuvant use of the trastuzumab has been shown to significantly reduce recurrence risk when added to standard chemotherapy in women with early-stage cHER2+ BC, not all cases derive similar benefit from trastuzumab because a significant number of cHER2+ BC patients develop disease recurrence. Unfortunately, the identification of a robust clinical predictor of trastuzumab benefit, including HER2 itself, has proven challenging in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting. Thus, we suggest that a new generation of research needs to refine the prognostic taxonomy of cHER2+ BC and develop easy-to-use, clinicbased prediction algorithms to distinguish between good- and poor- responders to trastuzumab-based therapy ab initio. This study offered two hypotheses: 1.) HER2 overexpression can unexpectedly take place in a molecular background owned by basal-like BC (a commonly HER2-negative BC subtype which possesses many epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics and exhibits robust cancer stem cell [CSC]-like features), thus generating a so-called basal/cHER2+ BC subtype; 2.) the basal/cHER2+ phenotype confers poor prognosis and delineates a subgroup of intrinsically aggressive cHER2+ BC with primary resistance to trastuzumab...

Discovery and validation of serologic biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of invasive candidiasis by computational immunomics

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is an opportunistic systemic mycosis caused by Candida species (commonly Candida albicans) that continues to pose a significant public health problem worldwide. Despite great advances in antifungal therapy and changes in clinical practices, IC remains a major infectious cause of morbidity and mortality in severely immunocompromised or critically ill patients, and further accounts for substantial healthcare costs. Its impact on patient clinical outcome and economic burden could be ameliorated by timely initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy. However, early detection of IC is extremely difficult because of its unspecific clinical signs and symptoms, and the inadequate accuracy and time delay of the currently available diagnostic or risk stratification methods. In consequence, the diagnosis of IC is often attained in advanced stages of infection (leading to delayed therapeutic interventions and ensuing poor clinical outcomes) or, unfortunately, at autopsy. In addition to the difficulties encountered in diagnosing IC at an early stage, the initial therapeutic decision-making process is also hindered by the insufficient accuracy of the currently available tools for predicting clinical outcomes in individual IC patients at presentation. Therefore, it is not surprising that clinicians are generally unable to early detect IC, and identify those IC patients who are most likely to suffer fatal clinical outcomes and may benefit from more personalized therapeutic strategies at presentation. Better diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for IC are thus needed to improve the clinical management of this life-threatening and costly opportunistic fungal infection...